Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/6] fnic: add fnic_scsi.c and fnic_io.h.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mike Christie wrote:
Joe Eykholt wrote:
James Smart wrote:

Mike Christie wrote:
Well - what should be happening is - prior to the reset or as part of
it, the fc transport fc_remote_port_delete() call should be made on all those remote ports that connectivity is about to be terminated on. This
will place all the associated targets/luns on those rports into a
blocked state, and start the devloss timer on them.  This will suspend
the eh path as well. Thus, things suspend until either the driver/fcoe
What do you mean by that? For lpfc it will or for this driver? This
driver does not have that block call like lpfc_block_error_handler, so
if the rport event occurs after the scsi eh is running we do not suspend
the eh.

So below I am saying we should make the lpfc_block_error_handler
functionality and the equivalent in the qla2xxx and mpfc common so
libfc/fcoe and fnic can use it.
Well there's successive layers of the onion here. And your right, one of
them is the block_error_handler.  Agreed, all of this should be common.

-- james s


I think you're both on the right track. When we reset the local port, it should make all remote ports non-ready ... we no longer have a PLOGI to them. Until we redo FLOGI and discovery, no SCSI ops will succeed. fc_lport_reset() calls fc_lport_set_fid, which calls lp_rport_reset_list() ... but that doesn't seem to do much to rports other than the
directory server.

fc_rport_reset() puts the rport in state INIT, but I don't think that's enough. Maybe
that's where the remote port should get blocked.  Sound right?


Did you see the thread
http://www.open-fcoe.org/pipermail/devel/2008-July/000394.html
I think we basically said we need to overhaul the fc class fc_remote_port and the libfc's use - some of the discussion went off list into some call. James and Chris were going to work on it. I think both got busy with other issues or are still working on it.

Hit send too soon.

We basically should be deleting the port for these scenarios, then that sets the dev_loss_tmo and blocks the rport. We should then wait in the eh for the rport to be added back or for the dev_loss_tmo to fire.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux