On Fri, 22 Aug 2008, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Fri, Aug 22 2008, Jens Axboe wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 15 2008, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > > > > I have applied this and the previous, with a fixup to raid5 to overload > > > > both active stripe and process count in bi_phys_segments. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Jens Axboe > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > So here are two new patches. Patch 3 drops blk_queue_max_hw_segments > > > function and max_hw_segments entry. I checked all the drivers, most of > > > them set blk_queue_max_hw_segments equal to blk_queue_max_phys_segments, > > > for the few ones that don't (for example scsi_lib.c), I set minimum of the > > > two values with blk_queue_max_phys_segments. > > > > > > The next patch 4 drops the hw_segments logic from MMC card subsystem. > > > > Thanks, I've queued both up for review and inclusion for 2.6.28. > > Spoke too soon, they don't really apply to the for-2.6.28 branch of the > block git tree that has your two previous patches. Can you please > recheck and resend against that? > > -- > Jens Axboe I've just cloned git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-2.6-block.git and found out that none of my four patches are there. So no wonder that patches 3 and 4 won't apply if the patches 1 and 2 aren't there. What do you want the patches against? git/axboe/linux-2.6-block.git? Or something different? Mikulas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
