Re: [PATCH] make sr_mod report more accurate drive status after closing the tray.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



James Bottomley wrote:
On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 17:24 -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
Right now, when using sr_mod and issuing the CDROM_DRIVE_STATUS ioctl,
there's no way to differentiate between when you've just closed the
drive tray, but the media is not yet loaded, and when there's no media.
This seems to be accidental.

Here's a patch that seems to fix this behaviour:

I'm very wary of doing something like this because it took us months to
fix up all the breakage the last time ...

That's certainly understandable. What I'm hitting is that I can't tell the difference any more between not having media and it simply not being ready yet. And the amount of time it takes to become ready seems to vary wildly (1s on one drive I've got here, ~20s on another fairly new drive), so a timeout isn't even a very effective kludge.

Signed-off-by: Peter Jones <pjones@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sr_ioctl.c b/drivers/scsi/sr_ioctl.c
index ae87d08..43a084b 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sr_ioctl.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sr_ioctl.c
@@ -306,10 +306,9 @@ int sr_drive_status(struct cdrom_device_info *cdi, int slot)
  		/* we have no changer support */
  		return -EINVAL;
  	}
-	if (0 == sr_test_unit_ready(cd->device, &sshdr))
-		return CDS_DISC_OK;
-
-	if (!cdrom_get_media_event(cdi, &med)) {
+	if (0 == sr_test_unit_ready(cd->device, &sshdr)
+			&& sshdr.sense_key == 0

This can't be right; if the return is zero, the sense_key must also be
zero (as in to have valid sense, it must have returned with at least
DRIVER_SENSE)

+			&& !cdrom_get_media_event(cdi, &med)) {

And this really doesn't look right either.  Now you're only calling the
media event if the test unit ready succeeded.  A drive can be open (thus
returning not ready and hence non zero) and still give you a valid media
event.

Ok, that's a fair point. That part I'm really trying to avoid here is returning the CDS_NO_DSIC case when the sense key says we don't yet know (NOT_READY). So probably that case simply shouldn't be returned until after we do the SK/ASC/ASCQ check.


  		if (med.media_present)
  			return CDS_DISC_OK;
  		else if (med.door_open)
@@ -319,10 +318,27 @@ int sr_drive_status(struct cdrom_device_info *cdi, int slot)
  	}

  	/*
-	 * 0x04 is format in progress .. but there must be a disc present!
+	 * ASC: 0x04: "logical unit is not ready"
+	 * ASCQ: 0x01: cause not reportable
+	 *       0x02: in process of becoming ready
+	 *       0x03: initializing command required
+	 *       0x04: format in progress .. but there must be a disc present!
+	 *       0x07: operation in progress
+	 *       0x08: long write in progress
  	 */
-	if (sshdr.sense_key == NOT_READY && sshdr.asc == 0x04)
-		return CDS_DISC_OK;

This seems to be a nasty historical lie.  It seems to play into the new
media changed stuff by stalling the change until the media is ready.
Convince me that if we actually tell the truth here we're not going to
fire a slew of spurious events at hal.

Would you be ok with a more minimal approach, where I only change the behaviour of NOT_READY/4/4 ? I understand if you still want more study of the effects WRT udev/hal.

+	if (sshdr.sense_key == NOT_READY && sshdr.asc == 0x04) {
+		switch (sshdr.ascq) {
+			case 0x01:
+			case 0x02:
+				return CDS_DRIVE_NOT_READY;
+			case 0x03:
+				return CDS_TRAY_OPEN;

That's a stretch ... the initialising command can be start motor, but
the tray can be closed just fine.

Yes, it definitely is. I don't feel strongly about this particular case, but the rationale was that as long as we're not handling that in the driver, then this case essentially means user intervention is required (though there's really no way for the user to know what that would be). CDS_TRAY_OPEN is, AFAICT, the only return value that means that in other cases (i.e., on slot-loaders). This part isn't critical to the functionality I need; it just seemed wrong when I was reading it.

--
  Peter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux