"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>>>>> "Jeff" == Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Jeff> Hmm, up until this point you use bi to mean bio_integrity, but > Jeff> now it means blk_integrity. Confusion will ensue. ;) > > Err, uhm. There is no bio_integrity. There's the bio integrity > payload which I always refer to as struct bip *bip. And struct > blk_integrity which is always bi. I'm also anal about using bv for > the data bio_vec and iv for the integrity bio_vec. I can't see any > place where I'm inconsistent. Wow, I have no idea where I got that impression. Sorry! > Jeff> struct blk_integrity_exchg is not yet defined in your patch set, > Jeff> so this will likely break git bisect. > > bio-integrity.patch and blk-integrity.patch are artificially split up > to ease the review process. They are not meant to be separate > changesets. OK, just wanted to make sure you were aware of it. Cheers, Jeff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
