Re: Intel IOMMU (and IOMMU for Virtualization) performances

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> I'm just interested in other people's opinions on IOMMU
> implementations, performances, possible future changes for performance
> improvement, etc.

I think using the bitmap is an excellent idea and your numbers look good. 
Do you have numbers on the memory consumption too?
Trading some memory for performance is ok for something as performance critical 
as the IOMMU. 

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux