On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 20:37 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Wed, May 28 2008, James Bottomley wrote: > > Well, the DAC960 is very old. It has a trick we escaped from in SCSI > > where if it gets an error in the request it resubmits it a sector at a > > time. It sounds very much like it's doing that for every request if the > > I/O speed is down to a few k/s. > > > > So, could you try this patch? It won't fix anything, but if the message > > spews all over the console, we know the 1 sector at a time retry is > > causing the problems. If not we'll try to think of something else ... > > A bit unlikely, me thinks... I can't really see any other way of getting such a massive slowdown ... but give us your straws, we can grasp at them too ... > Anyway, a blktrace dump of some IO would show what is going on. I'm > assuming the problem is persistent across IO schedulers? Yes, that might help. If it's not the one sector chunk problem it would have to be either some strange wait issue or massive retries. James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
