Re: [PATCH 1/4] block: use ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN as the default dma pad mask

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 20 May 2008 02:52:31 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, 20 May 2008 17:38:20 +0800 Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 02:31:29AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >
> > > So here you're using it for "dma aligment" whereas crypto is using it
> > > (or ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN!) for "cpu 64-bit alignment".
> > 
> > No the 64-bit alignment is just an example.  The purpose of
> > CRYPTO_MINALIGN is pretty much the same as ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN,
> > i.e., the minimum alignment guaranteed by kmalloc.  The only
> > reason it exists is because ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN isn't defined
> > on all platforms.
> 
> I'm struggling to understand what you're saying here.
> 
> The comment you have there over the CRYPTO_MINALIGN definition is quite
> specific.  Is it wrong?
> 
> Whether the mapping between CRYPTO_MINALIGN and ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN
> is abusive is (I find) hard to say, because first one would need to be
> able to say what ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN is for.  I expect it was for DMA
> purposes.

Yeah, ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN is for DMA. Non coherent platforms define
it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux