Re: Query regarding modifying the DMA Mask based on the available memory in the system

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 16:44 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >
> > For drivers that can alter their descriptor types, we have this
> > function:
> >
> > dma_get_required_mask()
> 
> Are you sure we have it? It seems to be in drivers/base/platform.c
> conditional on ARCH_HAS_DMA_GET_REQUIRED_MASK, but according to my
> grep no architecture ever sets that flag.

Yes ... positive.  That's the default and correct implementation based
on the largest addressable physical memory.

> I don't think it would be very hard to implement on x86 at least,
> mind you. Just nobody seems to have done it so far.

Really, only machines with IOMMUs that want to restrict this need
implement it.  Current safety is predicated on the assumption that no
architectures with IOMMUs never return bus physical addresses above
memory physical.  If that's not true, then they *have* to implement
this.  For all others its an optimisation to return a more restricted
range.

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux