Re: [PATCH] [AACRAID] Do not describe check_reset parameter with its value

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 14:43 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Do not describe check_reset parameter with its value
>     
> Describe check_reset parameter with its name (and not its value)

OK, added this, thanks.  There's one slight problem I corrected:

> Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Salyzyn <Mark_Salyzyn@xxxxxxxxxxx>

This should be Acked-by not Signed-off-by.

The rules are that Signed-off-by tracks the provenance of a patch (where
it came from).  So if you send the patch to Mark and he sends it to me,
it would have his Signed-off-by because it went through his hands (and
his tree).  If Mark acks the patch, but you send it to me, then it gets
an acked-by because it didn't actually pass through his hands.

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux