On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 12:57:20PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 12:15 -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 14:06 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > > Here's a huge patch from Tony and Kay that converts the scsi layer to > > > use struct device instead of class_device. > > > > > > It doesn't seem like it could be split up any smaller due to the > > > interconectedness of the whole mess, if you have any suggestions > > > otherwise, it would be appreciated. > > > > > > If you want, I can take this through my tree as it does depend on a > > > previous IB patch to make that portion of the patch much smaller. > > > > > > After this, all of the class_device code is now finally gone from the > > > kernel! > > > > Actually, I have it built and running (actually 2.6.25-rc5-mc5 which > > includes all the changes in your tree). Amazingly it's pretty much > > fully functional, except ses which seems to have suffered a breakdown in > > the way its model works. I'll see if I can fix it up. > > > > Since the patch is separable, it's probably best to take it through the > > SCSI tree ... including the infiniband bits that depend on the > > iser/iscsi transport classes. You can give the rest of the infiniband > > pieces to roland, since he's got a nasty set of clashes with the > > __FUNCTION__->__func__ conversion which I don't want to be responsible > > for. > > OK, I've changed my mind ... it doesn't really work well without all the > rest of the pieces ... plus I think there are going to be merge nasties > which I'd rather you sorted out. Ok, so what do you want me to do? I can keep the scsi patch and the IB patches in my tree and merge them that way, but I think it causes problems with your scsi patches. That will cause the -next and -mm tree issues, right? > What I'll do is run a scsi-post-merge-2.6 tree here: > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi-post-merge-2.6.git;a=summary > > I've dropped a quasi stable branch from your quilt tree and plumbed it > into the -mc tree generation machinery, so it will warn me if you make > too radical an alteration to your quilt. So I shouldn't drop the patch from my tree? confused, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
