On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 04:41:55PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > This is supposed to be a bug fix patch to get suspend/resume working. > Because you've made it dependent on the msi_enable patch, which is a > feature enhancement, it still can't go in the scsi-rc-fixes tree. > > Isn't it just best at this point to go with Darrick's patch for fixing > 2.6.25 and 2.6.24? I can say that I've tested my patch on a IBM Z30, x3200 M2, and x3350, and all of them failed to resume before the patch and successfully resumed afterwards. Nobody from LSI has ever said "Don't do this, it's dangerous/kills kittens/etc." and (afaik) it has sat around in -mm without causing people trouble. So, I agree with this plan to apply mine as a stop-gap for .25 and .24, and we'll get to Sathya's version for 2.6.26. Unless, of course, somebody wants to extract just the part of Sathya's patch (the clause starting with the "PCI-express errata" comment, I presume?) and submit that? --D -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
