On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:20:09 +0200
Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Since the separation of sense_buffer from scsi_cmnd, Drivers that hack their
> own struct scsi_cmnd like here isd200, must also take care of their own
> sense_buffer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/usb/storage/isd200.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/isd200.c b/drivers/usb/storage/isd200.c
> index 4f2d143..971d13d 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/storage/isd200.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/storage/isd200.c
> @@ -1470,6 +1470,7 @@ static void isd200_free_info_ptrs(void *info_)
> if (info) {
> kfree(info->id);
> kfree(info->RegsBuf);
> + kfree(info->srb.sense_buffer);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -1495,7 +1496,9 @@ static int isd200_init_info(struct us_data *us)
> kzalloc(sizeof(struct hd_driveid), GFP_KERNEL);
> info->RegsBuf = (unsigned char *)
> kmalloc(sizeof(info->ATARegs), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!info->id || !info->RegsBuf) {
> + info->srb.sense_buffer =
> + kmalloc(SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!info->id || !info->RegsBuf || !info->srb.sense_buffer) {
> isd200_free_info_ptrs(info);
> kfree(info);
> retStatus = ISD200_ERROR;
I've thoroughly lost the plot here. Is this needed in 2.6.25? If so, why?
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
