On Thu, Mar 06 2008, James Bottomley wrote: > On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 07:28 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 05 2008, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 12:17:27 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > > > ping. James, Jens? > > > > Fine with me, though it's really up to James to pass judgement on this. > > In principle, yes, when (if) it's actually made useful, it would belong > at the block layer (or even in misc or the md/dm layer), but while it's > a bit vestigial, there's not really much point in moving it. I'll tie a > knot in my hankie to see if I can make it progress and then we can see > where it should go. I mistakenly thought that the md raid stuff was already moved over, since the patch to move the transport was suggested. If it isn't and SCSI is still the sole user of that code, then by all means keep it there. Once patches for md or eg cciss or other block raid controllers are supplied, then it'll make sense to move the transport class. IOW, I completely agree with you James and thought we were further ahead than we really are :-) -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
