Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] block: add rq->complete_io hook for request stacking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>  I would rather have rq->complete_io() to be pointing to blk_end_io in the
>  default case, this way rq->complete_io() would always be valid and we
>  would be saving us the if() clause.

This is a good idea. But...

...
>  So when using my proposal this would just become:
>
>  {
>     BUG_ON(!rq->complete_io);
>
>     return rq->complete_io(rq, error, nr_bytes, 0, NULL);
>  }

This "BUG_ON" is also an "if()" clause except
it will panic. The box will panic if the function
pointer is a null pointer and it won't be hard to
sort out why. I suggest omitting the BUG_ON.

thanks,
grant
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux