Re: [PATCH] bugfix for an underflow condition in usb storage & isd200.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 03:23:39PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> 
> > Six of one and a half-dozen of the other.  All we're arguing over is the
> > definition of "correct behavior" here.  You want to change the API so that
> > overrun is acceptable and handled; I prefer calling it a Bad Thing(tm).
> > 
> > We both agree that the code shouldn't run off the end of the s-g list.
> > 
> > Since you've already committed to updating the patch, then we can do it
> > your way.  Just make sure it's very very clear in the comments.
> 
> Okay, here's my version.  It makes some significant changes to the 
> interface for usb_stor_access_xfer_buf() -- in particular, the context 
> information is now stored in an opaque structure rather than in ad-hoc 
> local variables.  All the callers are updated to use the new interface.

Maybe this is a crazy question, but...

Why is this not in the SCSI core?  It's hardly USB-specific, and I'm
willing to bet that there are other HCDs (at least spb2) which need to do
this sort of thing...

Matt

-- 
Matthew Dharm                              Home: mdharm-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver

YOU SEE!!?? It's like being born with only one nipple!
					-- Erwin
User Friendly, 10/19/1998

Attachment: pgpwkTBoJfDO5.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux