On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:14:01 +0100 Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > James Bottomley schrieb: > > > These are both features being independently worked on, are they not? > > Even if they weren't, the combination of the size of SCST in kernel plus > > the problem of having to find a migration path for the current STGT > > users still looks to me to involve the greater amount of work. > > I don't want to be mean, but does anyone actually use STGT in > production? Seriously? > > In the latest development version of STGT, it's only possible to stop > the tgtd target daemon using KILL / 9 signal - which also means all > iSCSI initiator connections are corrupted when tgtd target daemon is > started again (kernel upgrade, target daemon upgrade, server reboot etc.). I don't know what "iSCSI initiator connections are corrupted" mean. But if you reboot a server, how can an iSCSI target implementation keep iSCSI tcp connections? > Imagine you have to reboot all your NFS clients when you reboot your NFS > server. Not only that - your data is probably corrupted, or at least the > filesystem deserves checking... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
