On Feb 4, 2008 11:30 AM, Douglas Gilbert <dougg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Alan Cox wrote: > >> better. So for example, I personally suspect that ATA-over-ethernet is way > >> better than some crazy SCSI-over-TCP crap, but I'm biased for simple and > >> low-level, and against those crazy SCSI people to begin with. > > > > Current ATAoE isn't. It can't support NCQ. A variant that did NCQ and IP > > would probably trash iSCSI for latency if nothing else. > > And a variant that doesn't do ATA or IP: > http://www.fcoe.com/ > however, and interestingly enough, the open-fcoe software target depends on scst (for now anyway) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
