On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 16:32 -0800, Chandra Seetharaman wrote: > Subject: scsi_dh: Add support for SDEV_PASSIVE > > From: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@xxxxxxxxxx> > > This patch adds a new device state SDEV_PASSIVE, to correspond to the > passive side access of an active/passive multipathed device. Really, no; this isn't right. The state field of a SCSI device is for the SCSI state model. Passive might be a valid device mapper state, but it's not a valid SCSI state. If these patches can't work except by mucking with the SCSI state model, there's some layering problem elsewhere that needs sorting out. James - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html