Re: Performance of SCST versus STGT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jan 24, 2008 8:54 PM, Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ib_rdma_bw now reports 933 MB/s on the same system, correct? Those
> ~250MB/s difference is what you will gain with zero-copy IO implemented
> and what STGT with the current architecture has no chance to achieve.

Yes, that's correct:
* ib_rdma_bw, ib_write_bw and ib_read_bw report 933 MB/s between the
two test systems.
* ib_read_bw reports 905 MB/s.
* ib_rdma_lat reports 3.1 microseconds.
* ib_read_lat reports 7.5 microseconds.

Bart.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux