On Jan 18, 2008 1:08 PM, Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > [ ... ] > So, seems I understood your slides correctly: the more valuable data for > our SCST SRP vs STGT iSER comparison should be on page 26 for 1 command > read (~480MB/s, i.e. ~60% from Bart's result on the equivalent hardware). At least in my tests SCST performed significantly better than STGT. These tests were performed with the currently available implementations of SCST and STGT. Which performance improvements are possible for these projects (e.g. zero-copying), and by how much is it expected that these performance improvements will increase throughput and will decrease latency ? Bart. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
