Re: Performance of SCST versus STGT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jan 17, 2008 6:45 PM, Pete Wyckoff <pw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> There's nothing particularly stunning here.  Suspect Bart has
> configuration issues if not even IPoIB will do > 100 MB/s.

Regarding configuration issues: the systems I ran the test on probably
communicate via PCI-e x4 with the InfiniBand HCA's. With other systems
with identical software and with PCI-e x8 HCA's on the same InfiniBand
network I reach a throughput of 934 MB/s instead of 675 MB/s (PCI-e
x4). This is something I only found out today, otherwise I would have
run all tests on the systems with PCI-e x8 HCA's.

So the relative utilization of the InfiniBand network is as follows:
* STGT + iSER, PCI-e x4 HCA: 324/675 = 48% (measured myself)
* STGT + iSER, PCI-e x8 HCA: 550/934 = 59%
(http://www.osc.edu/~pw/papers/wyckoff-iser-snapi07-talk.pdf)
* SCST + SRP, PCI-e x4 HCA: 600/675 = 89% (measured myself)

Or: SCST uses the InfiniBand network much more effectively than STGT.

Bart.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux