Re: [Stgt-devel] Performance of SCST versus STGT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jan 17, 2008 1:29 PM, Robin Humble <robin.humble+stgt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> was iscsiadm was pointed at the IP of the IPoIB interface on the target? I think tgtd requires that.
>
> how about setting the transport to be iser with eg.
>   iscsiadm --mode node --targetname <something> --portal <ipoib>:3260 --op update -n node.transport_name -v iser
>   iscsiadm --mode node --targetname <something> --portal <ipoib>:3260 --op update -n "node.conn[0].iscsi.HeaderDigest" -v None

Ah, thanks. After issuing these commands I get better performance with
STGT and iSER. The updated table is as follows:

                             STGT read             SCST read
                          performance (MB/s)   performance (MB/s)
Ethernet (1 Gb/s network)        77                    89
IPoIB (8 Gb/s network)           82                   229
SRP (8 Gb/s network)            N/A                   600
iSER (8 Gb/s network)           324                   N/A

Can we conclude that with the tested software versions SCST performs
significantly better than STGT on an InfiniBand network ?

Bart.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux