On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 19:08 +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 05 2008 at 1:02 +0200, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 13:44 +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> >> - If we export scsi_init_io()/scsi_release_buffers() instead of
> >> scsi_{alloc,free}_sgtable() from scsi_lib than tgt code is
> >> much more insulated from scsi_lib changes. As a bonus it will
> >> also gain bidi capability when it comes.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Acked-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > I'm afraid the reversion of ->done removal broke the application of this
> > yet again ... could you respin.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > James
> >
> It looks like the revert is to be reverted ;)
> I have rebased, but should I wait a while to
> see if they're needed?
Yes, let's just wait a while to see what the outcome is ...
James
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
