Re: [PATCH 2/2] relax scsi dma alignment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 1 Jan 2008, James Bottomley wrote:

> On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 17:57 -0500, Alan Stern wrote:

> > It would be better to move the existing code from the start of
> > slave_configure() up into slave_alloc().  Otherwise it's fine.
> 
> Um, yes, you're right, I didn't notice there was an existing one ... I
> just assumed you were relying on the SCSI default.
> 
> Here's an updated patch.
> 
> James

If I had put the alignment call in the correct place to begin with, 
this change wouldn't be needed.  Ah well...

Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux