On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 13:25 -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 12:37:31PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote: > > This is bad for two reasons: > > > > 1. If they're returned to outside applications, no-one knows what > > they mean. > > 2. Eventually they'll clash with the ever expanding standard error > > codes. > > > > The problem error code in question is ETASK. I've replaced this by > > ECOMM (communications error on send) a network error code that seems to > > most closely relay what ETASK meant. > > Yay, cleanups :) Don't get your hopes up ... this was just one that unavoidably crossed my attention path while I was doing something else. I'm not going out looking for these things ... mainly for fear of finding them in large quantities. James - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
