On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 14:30 -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > On 12/19/2007 03:48 AM, Filippos Papadopoulos wrote: > > On Dec 17, 2007 2:18 PM, Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I have found one problem. Please try patch [2] below and report. > >> If it still fails try to enable debugging by setting with patch [1] > >> these values at top of drivers/scsi/initio.c. And send dmsgs. > >> > >> Boaz > >> > > > > > > I tried patch[2] (addition of sg++) at 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 but the > > system hangs after some seconds when the initio driver loads. > > I will try patch[1] next week to see what happens. > > > > Would it be better to open a bug report at bugzilla? > > > > There is also a Fedora bug report against 2.6.23. The user has > applied commit e9e42faf47255274a1ed0b9bf1c46118023ec5fa from > 2.6.24-rc plus the two additional fixes under discussion and it > hangs for him too. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390531 It really sounds like there's some problem applying the patches. The consistent report throughout is this one: initio: I/O port range 0x0 is busy. Which should be fixed by 99f1f534922a2f2251ba05b14657a1c62882a80e. I didn't actually find that in the bug thread anywhere, but maybe I missed it? James > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
