Re: [PATCH 0/5] sg_ring for scsi

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 10:13:38 +1100

> But, as demonstrated, there are real benefits of having an explicit header:
> 
> 1) It removes the chain-end/explicit count ambiguity (see 
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/25/209 & thread)
> 2) It allows others to manipulate sg chains, which couldn't be done before
>    (eg. the ATA code which wants to append a padding element).
> 3) I can now hand you an sg ring for you to fill: sg chains can't do that.
> 
> In short, sg_ring is generally useful primitive.  sg chains are a clever hack 
> for scsi_lib to create, and everyone else to read.

I do not refute any of this :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux