I wrote:
> If the implicated commit is the next one in time
> sequence relative to
>
> # good: [2f1f53bdc6531696934f6ee7bbdfa2ab4f4f62a3] CRISv10 fasttimer: Scrap INLINE and name timeval_cmp better
>
> then the test of whether I bisected correctly is as simple as applying
> the commit and seeing if things break, because I'm running on the
> kernel corresponding to 2f1f53bdc6531696934f6ee7bbdfa2ab4f4f62a3 right
> now. Let me give that a try and I'll report back.
Verified that 6f37ac793d6ba7b35d338f791974166f67fdd9ba is the next
commit after the "good" kernel I'm running now. The build is running,
and I should have an answer for us in a few hours.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Tracy | "They couldn't hit an elephant at this dist- "
rct@xxxxxxxx | - Last words of Union General John Sedgwick,
| Battle of Spotsylvania Court House, U.S. Civil War
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
