On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 10:32:56 +0200 Benny Halevy <bhalevy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Nov. 08, 2007, 5:13 +0200, FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 20:16:19 +0200 > > Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> - If we export scsi_init_io()/scsi_release_buffers() instead of > >> scsi_{alloc,free}_sgtable() from scsi_lib than tgt code is > >> much more insulated from scsi_lib changes. As a bonus it will > >> also gain bidi capability when it comes. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Looks good for me except for this: > > > > ./scripts/checkpatch.pl ~/Mail/kernel/scsi/28814 > > ERROR: use tabs not spaces > > #101: FILE: drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c:741: > > + gfp_t gfp_mask)$ > > Come on Tomo, tabs should be used for nesting, not for decoration. > This way no matter what's your tab expansion setup is the > code will look correct and will make sense. The number of space I've never heard about that rule. I use tabs and minimum spaces for decoration. But it's just about the style. The patch is fine by me if you like to use only spaces there. Thanks, - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html