RE: [PATCH -mm 11/11] aacraid: use pci_set_dma_max_seg_size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Not requesting you to test (aacraid), just scoping any effort.

The cards in question are the (old) Dell PERC variety that would trigger
the need. I will notify our Dell liaison to see what they can do.

Sincerely -- Mark Salyzyn

> -----Original Message-----
> From: FUJITA Tomonori [mailto:tomof@xxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 12:22 PM
> To: Salyzyn, Mark
> Cc: tomof@xxxxxxx; akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
> linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
> James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxx; AACRAID; fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [PATCH -mm 11/11] aacraid: use pci_set_dma_max_seg_size
> 
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:34:23 -0400
> "Salyzyn, Mark" <mark_salyzyn@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > ACK
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> > Based on the presence of the call. 2.6.22, for instance, 
> does not have
> > this capability...
> > 
> > I did not test this change, just accepting on the 
> principals. How much
> > testing of the change did you do Fujita?
> 
> Unfortunately, I tested only the main component (device and pci
> changes) with ppc64 IOMMU. I don't have the other IOMMUs.
> 
> I didn't test the aacraid patch but I guess that I have aacraid in the
> workplace so I can test the patch (without the IOMMU chages).
> 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux