On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 04:15:07PM +0800, Ma Ke wrote:
> Once device_add() failed, we should call put_device() to decrement
> reference count for cleanup. Or it could cause memory leak.
>
> As comment of device_add() says, 'if device_add() succeeds, you should
> call device_del() when you want to get rid of it. If device_add() has
> not succeeded, use only put_device() to drop the reference count'.
>
> Found by code review.
>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fixes: 8434aa8b6fe5 ("[SCSI] iscsi: break up session creation into two stages")
> Signed-off-by: Ma Ke <make24@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c
> index 9c347c64c315..74333e182612 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c
> @@ -2114,6 +2114,7 @@ int iscsi_add_session(struct iscsi_cls_session *session, unsigned int target_id)
> release_dev:
> device_del(&session->dev);
> release_ida:
> + put_device(&session->dev);
> if (session->ida_used)
> ida_free(&iscsi_sess_ida, session->target_id);
> destroy_wq:
How was this tested?
I do not think this change is correct at all, please prove it by showing
how it was tested.
thanks,
greg k-h
