Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] sysctl/coda: Fixes timeout bounds

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 09:16:10AM -0500, Joel Granados wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 10:58:18AM +0100, nicolas.bouchinet@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Nicolas Bouchinet <nicolas.bouchinet@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Bound coda timeout sysctl writings between SYSCTL_ZERO
> > and SYSCTL_INT_MAX.
> > 
> > The proc_handler has thus been updated to proc_dointvec_minmax.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Bouchinet <nicolas.bouchinet@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  fs/coda/sysctl.c | 4 +++-
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/coda/sysctl.c b/fs/coda/sysctl.c
> > index 0df46f09b6cc5..d6f8206c51575 100644
> > --- a/fs/coda/sysctl.c
> > +++ b/fs/coda/sysctl.c
> > @@ -20,7 +20,9 @@ static const struct ctl_table coda_table[] = {
> >  		.data		= &coda_timeout,
> I noticed that coda_timeout is an unsigned long. With that in mind I
> would change it to unsigned int. It seems to be a value that can be
> ranged within [0,INT_MAX]

That seems fine by me.

It is a timeout in seconds and it is typically set to some value well
under a minute.

Jan




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux