On Tuesday, February 25, 2025 11:32 PM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 01:51:46PM -0800, Karan Tilak Kumar wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/fnic/fdls_disc.c b/drivers/scsi/fnic/fdls_disc.c
> > index 8843d9486dbb..6530298733f0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/fnic/fdls_disc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/fnic/fdls_disc.c
> > @@ -311,36 +311,30 @@ void fdls_schedule_oxid_free_retry_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > unsigned long flags;
> > int idx;
> >
> > - spin_lock_irqsave(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
> > -
> > for_each_set_bit(idx, oxid_pool->pending_schedule_free, FNIC_OXID_POOL_SZ) {
> >
> > FNIC_FCS_DBG(KERN_INFO, fnic->host, fnic->fnic_num,
> > "Schedule oxid free. oxid idx: %d\n", idx);
> >
> > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
> > reclaim_entry = kzalloc(sizeof(*reclaim_entry), GFP_KERNEL);
> > - spin_lock_irqsave(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
> > -
> > if (!reclaim_entry) {
> > schedule_delayed_work(&oxid_pool->schedule_oxid_free_retry,
> > msecs_to_jiffies(SCHEDULE_OXID_FREE_RETRY_TIME));
> > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > if (test_and_clear_bit(idx, oxid_pool->pending_schedule_free)) {
>
> We discussed this earlier and I really should have brought it up then,
> but what is this check about? We "know" (scare quotes) that it is true
> because we're inside a for_each_set_bit() loop. I had assumed it was to
> test for race conditions so that's why I put it under the lock. If the
> locking doesn't matter then we could just do a clear_bit() without doing
> a second test.
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
> > reclaim_entry->oxid_idx = idx;
> > reclaim_entry->expires = round_jiffies(jiffies + delay_j);
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
> > list_add_tail(&reclaim_entry->links, &oxid_pool->oxid_reclaim_list);
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
> > schedule_delayed_work(&oxid_pool->oxid_reclaim_work, delay_j);
> > } else {
> > /* unlikely scenario, free the allocated memory and continue */
> > kfree(reclaim_entry);
> > }
> > }
>
> > -
> > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
> > }
> >
> > static bool fdls_is_oxid_fabric_req(uint16_t oxid)
> > --
> > 2.47.1
>
Thanks for your review and comments, Dan.
You are right; We reviewed it, and locking is only needed to add to the reclaim list.
We can use clear_bit. I'll send out a revised patch for this.
Regards,
Karan (on behalf of the Cisco team)
