On 2/12/25 2:14 AM, peter.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufs_trace.h b/drivers/ufs/core/ufs_trace.h
index 84deca2b841d..e175020a2fcc 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufs_trace.h
+++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufs_trace.h
@@ -83,17 +83,19 @@ UFS_CMD_TRACE_TSF_TYPES
TRACE_EVENT(ufshcd_clk_gating,
- TP_PROTO(const char *dev_name, int state),
+ TP_PROTO(const char *dev_name, struct ufs_hba *hba, int state),
- TP_ARGS(dev_name, state),
+ TP_ARGS(dev_name, hba, state),
TP_STRUCT__entry(
__string(dev_name, dev_name)
+ __field(struct ufs_hba *, hba)
__field(int, state)
),
TP_fast_assign(
__assign_str(dev_name);
+ __entry->hba = hba;
__entry->state = state;
),
Why to include the HBA pointer in tracing events if this pointer is not
used in any TP_printk() call?
dev_name == dev_name(hba->dev) so the dev_name argument should be left
out from all tracing events that now have a HBA pointer as argument.
Thanks,
Bart.