Re: [PATCH v1] ufs: core: add hba parameter to trace events

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/12/25 2:14 AM, peter.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufs_trace.h b/drivers/ufs/core/ufs_trace.h
index 84deca2b841d..e175020a2fcc 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufs_trace.h
+++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufs_trace.h
@@ -83,17 +83,19 @@ UFS_CMD_TRACE_TSF_TYPES
TRACE_EVENT(ufshcd_clk_gating, - TP_PROTO(const char *dev_name, int state),
+	TP_PROTO(const char *dev_name, struct ufs_hba *hba, int state),
- TP_ARGS(dev_name, state),
+	TP_ARGS(dev_name, hba, state),
TP_STRUCT__entry(
  		__string(dev_name, dev_name)
+		__field(struct ufs_hba *, hba)
  		__field(int, state)
  	),
TP_fast_assign(
  		__assign_str(dev_name);
+		__entry->hba = hba;
  		__entry->state = state;
  	),

Why to include the HBA pointer in tracing events if this pointer is not
used in any TP_printk() call?

dev_name == dev_name(hba->dev) so the dev_name argument should be left
out from all tracing events that now have a HBA pointer as argument.

Thanks,

Bart.




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux