Re: [PATCH v3] scsi: ufs: critical health condition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/10/25 5:58 AM, Avri Altman wrote:
To handle this new `sysfs` entry, either `udev` rules or some other
polling code can be configured to monitor changes in the
`critical_health` attribute.

Hmm ... I'm not aware of any support in udevd to poll on sysfs
attributes? I think that calling select(), poll() or epoll() is required
to wait for a sysfs_notify() call.

+Description:	Report the number of times a critical health event has been
+		reported by a UFS device. further insight into the specific

further -> Further?

+static ssize_t critical_health_show(struct device *dev,
+				    struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+{
+	struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", hba->critical_health);
+}

Now that the data type of hba->critical_health has been changed from
boolean into integer, should its name perhaps be changed into
hba->critical_health_count?

@@ -1130,6 +1131,9 @@ struct ufs_hba {
  	struct delayed_work ufs_rtc_update_work;
  	struct pm_qos_request pm_qos_req;
  	bool pm_qos_enabled;
+
+	/* HEALTH_CRITICAL exception reported */
+	int critical_health;
  };

Please leave out the inline comment since @critical_health already
has a kernel-doc comment.

Thanks,

Bart.




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux