Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/8] dm: add BLK_FEAT_WRITE_ZEROES_UNMAP support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 07:46:33PM +0800, Zhang Yi wrote:
> From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Set the BLK_FEAT_WRITE_ZEROES_UNMAP feature on stacking queue limits by
> default. This feature shall be disabled if any underlying device does
> not support it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/md/dm-table.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-table.c b/drivers/md/dm-table.c
> index bd8b796ae683..58cce31bcc1e 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-table.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-table.c
> @@ -598,7 +598,8 @@ int dm_split_args(int *argc, char ***argvp, char *input)
>  static void dm_set_stacking_limits(struct queue_limits *limits)
>  {
>  	blk_set_stacking_limits(limits);
> -	limits->features |= BLK_FEAT_IO_STAT | BLK_FEAT_NOWAIT | BLK_FEAT_POLL;
> +	limits->features |= BLK_FEAT_IO_STAT | BLK_FEAT_NOWAIT | BLK_FEAT_POLL |
> +			    BLK_FEAT_WRITE_ZEROES_UNMAP;
>  }
>  

dm_table_set_restrictions() can set limits->max_write_zeroes_sectors to
0, and it's called after dm_calculate_queue_limits(), which calls
blk_stack_limits(). Just to avoid having the BLK_FEAT_WRITE_ZEROES_UNMAP
still set while a device's max_write_zeroes_sectors is 0, it seems like
you would want to clear it as well if dm_table_set_restrictions() sets
limits->max_write_zeroes_sectors to 0.

-Ben

>  /*
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux