On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 4:37 AM Kees Cook <kees@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 05:12:11PM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote: > > On 2/6/25 17:00, Kees Cook wrote: ... > > So, the patch itself makes sense. But it does end up looking kinda > > funky. We call it a "str"ing and then annotate it as not a string. > > Yeah, this is true all over the place. It's a string, just not a > NUL-terminated string: *sob* Maybe call it respectively, e.g., __nontermstr ? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
