Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] scsi: st: Add sysfs file reset_blocked

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/31/25 5:49 AM, "Kai Mäkisara (Kolumbus)" wrote:
Combining the above and your suggestion, what about "position_lost_in_reset"
or "pos_lost_in_reset"? (Whatever the name is, the user should check what
has really happened. The name should point to the correct direction,
but it should be short enough.)

I like it!

Reviewed-by: John Meneghini <jmeneghi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: John Meneghini <jmeneghi@xxxxxxxxxx>





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux