On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 03:42:39PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 04:55:58PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > > You could have static const within functions too. You get the rodata > > protection and function local scope, best of both worlds? > > timer_active is on the stack, so it can't be static const. > > Does this really need to be cc'd to such a wide distribution list? That is a very good question. I removed 160 people from the original e-mail and left the ones that where previously involved with this patch and left all the lists for good measure. But it seems I can reduce it even more. How about this: For these treewide efforts I just leave the people that are/were involved in the series and add two lists: linux-kernel and linux-hardening. Unless someone screams, I'll try this out on my next treewide. Thx for the feedback Best -- Joel Granados
