Re: [PATCH] SPARC64: fix iommu sg chaining

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 17 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 02:45:47 -0700 (PDT)
> David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 18:24:01 +0900
> > 
> > > On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:16:29 +0200
> > > Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Wed, Oct 17 2007, David Miller wrote:
> > > > > I would suggest that other sg_last() uses be audited for the same bug.
> > > > 
> > > > Agree.
> > > 
> > > Only libata, I think.
> > 
> > There are a few other spots, like ide-scsi
> 
> Oops, I missed that. But seems that we have only three, ide-scsi,
> libata, sparc64 iommu.

And now only ide-scsi and libata, Dave killed sg_last() in sparc64
already. So less than I remember, I'd say kill it NOW...

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux