From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:16:29 +0200
> On Wed, Oct 17 2007, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 10:45:28 +0200
> >
> > > Righto, it's invalid to call sg_next() on the last entry!
> >
> > Unfortunately, that's what the sparc64 code wanted to do, this
> > transformation in the sparc64 sg chaining patch is not equilavent:
> >
> > - struct scatterlist *sg_end = sg + nelems;
> > + struct scatterlist *sg_end = sg_last(sg, nelems);
> > ...
> > - while (sg < sg_end &&
> > + while (sg != sg_end &&
>
> Auch indeed. That'd probably be better as a
>
> do {
> ...
> } while (sg != sg_end);
Ok, next bug, introduced by this change:
commit f565913ef8a8d0cfa46a1faaf8340cc357a46f3a
Author: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri Sep 21 10:44:19 2007 +0200
block: convert to using sg helpers
Convert the main rq mapper (blk_rq_map_sg()) to the sg helper setup.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Specifically this part:
new_segment:
- memset(&sg[nsegs],0,sizeof(struct scatterlist));
- sg[nsegs].page = bvec->bv_page;
- sg[nsegs].length = nbytes;
- sg[nsegs].offset = bvec->bv_offset;
+ sg = next_sg;
+ next_sg = sg_next(sg);
+ sg->page = bvec->bv_page;
+ sg->length = nbytes;
+ sg->offset = bvec->bv_offset;
You can't remove that memset(), it's there for a reason. The IOMMU
layers depended upon the code zero'ing out the whole scatterlist
struct, there might be more to it than page, length and offset :-)
In sparc64's case, this zero'd the dma_address and dma_length members
and the mapping algorithms use that to their advantage.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
