Re: [PATCH 06/14] cpumask: re-introduce cpumask_next{,_and}_wrap()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Dec 28, 2024 at 10:49:38AM -0800, Yury Norov wrote:
> cpumask_next_wrap_old() has two additional parameters, comparing to it's
> analogue in linux/find.h find_next_bit_wrap(). The reason for that is
> historical.

s/it's/its/

Personally I think cscope/tags/git grep make "find_next_bit_wrap()"
enough even without mentioning "linux/find.h".

> + * cpumask_next_and_wrap - get the next cpu in *src1p & *src2p, starting from
> + *			   @n and wrapping around, if needed
> + * @n: the cpu prior to the place to search (i.e. return will be > @n)

Is the return really > @n if it wraps?




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux