Re: [PATCH 12/14] scsi: lpfc: rework lpfc_next_{online,present}_cpu()
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: Yury Norov <yury.norov@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject
: Re: [PATCH 12/14] scsi: lpfc: rework lpfc_next_{online,present}_cpu()
From
: Justin Tee <justintee8345@xxxxxxxxx>
Date
: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 17:06:01 -0800
Cc
: linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Justin Tee <justin.tee@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, James Smart <james.smart@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>, Rasmus Villemoes <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to
: <
20241228184949.31582-13-yury.norov@gmail.com
>
Reviewed-by: Justin Tee <justin.tee@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Regards, Justin
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
References
:
[PATCH 00/14] cpumask: cleanup cpumask_next_wrap() implementation and usage
From:
Yury Norov
[PATCH 12/14] scsi: lpfc: rework lpfc_next_{online,present}_cpu()
From:
Yury Norov
Prev by Date:
Re: [PATCH 11/14] scsi: lpfc: switch lpfc_irq_rebalance() to using cpumask_next_wrap()
Next by Date:
[PATCH] scsi: avoid to send scsi command with ->queue_limits lock held
Previous by thread:
[PATCH 12/14] scsi: lpfc: rework lpfc_next_{online,present}_cpu()
Next by thread:
[PATCH 11/14] scsi: lpfc: switch lpfc_irq_rebalance() to using cpumask_next_wrap()
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[SCSI Target Devel]
[Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]
[Kernel Newbies]
[IDE]
[Security]
[Git]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux ATA RAID]
[Linux IIO]
[Samba]
[Device Mapper]