RE: [PATCH v4 1/3] scsi: ufs: core: Prepare to introduce a new clock_gating lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>, "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 1/3] scsi: ufs: core: Prepare to introduce a new clock_gating lock
From: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 20:50:32 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Cc: "linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bean Huo <beanhuo@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <2e5e888a-a7d8-4b10-a366-3cefd6685e69@acm.org>
Wdcipoutbound: EOP-TRUE

> Hi Avri,
> 
> I see two changes in this patch: introduction of the function
> ufshcd_has_pending_tasks() and removal of hba->clk_gating.active_reqs from
> ufshcd_is_ufs_dev_busy(). Shouldn't this patch be split into two patches -
> one patch per change?
Done.

Thanks,
Avri

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bart.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- [PATCH v4 0/3] Untie the host lock entanglement - part 2
  - From: Avri Altman
- [PATCH v4 1/3] scsi: ufs: core: Prepare to introduce a new clock_gating lock
  - From: Avri Altman
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] scsi: ufs: core: Prepare to introduce a new clock_gating lock
  - From: Bart Van Assche

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] scsi: ufs: core: Introduce a new clock_gating lock
Next by Date: RE: [PATCH v4 2/3] scsi: ufs: core: Introduce a new clock_gating lock
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] scsi: ufs: core: Prepare to introduce a new clock_gating lock
Next by thread: [PATCH v16 00/26] Improve write performance for zoned UFS devices
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [SCSI Target Devel] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Linux IIO] [Samba] [Device Mapper]