Re: [PATCH v16 07/26] block: Support block drivers that preserve the order of write requests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/19/24 09:27, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Many but not all storage controllers require serialization of zoned
> writes. Introduce a new request queue limit member variable related to
> write serialization. 'driver_preserves_write_order' allows block drivers
> to indicate that the order of write commands is preserved per hardware
> queue and hence that serialization of writes per zone is not required if
> all pending writes are submitted to the same hardware queue.
> 
> Cc: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  block/blk-settings.c   | 2 ++
>  include/linux/blkdev.h | 5 +++++
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-settings.c b/block/blk-settings.c
> index f1d4dfdc37a7..329d8b65a8d7 100644
> --- a/block/blk-settings.c
> +++ b/block/blk-settings.c
> @@ -633,6 +633,8 @@ int blk_stack_limits(struct queue_limits *t, struct queue_limits *b,
>  	}
>  	t->max_secure_erase_sectors = min_not_zero(t->max_secure_erase_sectors,
>  						   b->max_secure_erase_sectors);
> +	t->driver_preserves_write_order = t->driver_preserves_write_order &&
> +		b->driver_preserves_write_order;
>  	t->zone_write_granularity = max(t->zone_write_granularity,
>  					b->zone_write_granularity);
>  	if (!(t->features & BLK_FEAT_ZONED)) {
> diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> index a1fd0ddce5cf..72be33d02d1f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> @@ -397,6 +397,11 @@ struct queue_limits {
>  
>  	unsigned int		max_open_zones;
>  	unsigned int		max_active_zones;
> +	/*
> +	 * Whether or not the block driver preserves the order of write
> +	 * requests. Set by the block driver.
> +	 */
> +	bool			driver_preserves_write_order;

Why not make this a q->features flag ?

>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Drivers that set dma_alignment to less than 511 must be prepared to


-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux