On 10/31/24 2:15 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 10/31/24 12:55 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote:
Le 31/10/2024 à 18:51, Bart Van Assche a écrit :
Is the patch below sufficient to fix both issues?
Yes it does!
Thank you for having tested this patch quickly. Would it be possible
to test whether the patch below also fixes the reported boot failure?
I think the patch below is a better fix.
Thanks,
Bart.
diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
index a5a0646bb80a..3b592492e152 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
@@ -874,7 +874,8 @@ static void ufs_qcom_advertise_quirks(struct ufs_hba
*hba)
if (host->hw_ver.major > 0x3)
hba->quirks |= UFSHCD_QUIRK_REINIT_AFTER_MAX_GEAR_SWITCH;
- if (of_device_is_compatible(hba->dev->of_node, "qcom,sm8550-ufshc"))
+ if (of_device_is_compatible(hba->dev->of_node, "qcom,sm8550-ufshc") ||
+ of_device_is_compatible(hba->dev->of_node, "qcom,sm8650-ufshc"))
hba->quirks |= UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_LSDBS_CAP;
}
(replying to my own email)
Can anyone who has access to a Qualcomm SM8650 Platform please help with
testing the above patch on top of linux-next?
Thanks,
Bart.
