On 11/4/24 7:48 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
Since ufshcd_post_device_init is now called twice can you just check
that the simple fixup of removing the schedule_delayed_work() from it
is actually correct.
Hi James,
The conflict resolution in 6abc45870e04 ("Merge branch 'fixes' into for-
next") looks fine to me. If this would make things easier for the SCSI
maintainers I can rebase and retest my patch on top of the SCSI for-next
branch. This will cause it to be integrated later in the upstream kernel
(next merge window instead of current rc cycle).
Thank you,
Bart.
