RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2] ufs: core: Add WB buffer resize support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
> Sent: Montag, 28. Oktober 2024 19:38
> To: Bean Huo <huobean@xxxxxxxxx>; Huan Tang <tanghuan@xxxxxxxx>;
> linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: opensource.kernel@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2] ufs: core: Add WB buffer resize support
> 
> CAUTION: EXTERNAL EMAIL. Do not click links or open attachments unless
> you recognize the sender and were expecting this message.
> 
> 
> On 10/26/24 12:40 PM, Bean Huo wrote:
> > I saw that "Both UFS 4.1 and UFS 5.0 are currently in development"
> > have not been officially published yet. Are you keen to incorporate
> > features based on an unpublished standard?
> 
> Hi Bean,
> 
> UFS WG members approved the WB buffer resize functionality through the
> JEDEC voting process about one year ago. Isn't that sufficient to implement
> this functionality in the kernel? See also the JC-64.1 December 7, 2023
> meeting minutes.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bart.
> 

Bart,

That's not a reason we must implement it. Not everything that exists is reasonable, especially those things designed by humans. 

My question is, UFS 4.1 has not been officially published. However, I noticed that you have strongly supported this work. Even though I don't think it's necessary to enable a Sysfs node entry for this configuration.


Kind regards,
Bean




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux