Re: [PATCHv9 4/7] block, fs: add write hint to kiocb

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 08:38:05AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > > +	if (bdev_is_partition(bdev) &&
> > > +	    !test_bit(hint - 1, bdev->write_hint_mask))
> > > +		return file_inode(iocb->ki_filp)->i_write_hint;
> > 
> > I would have expected an error when using an invalid stream identifier.
> 
> It's a hint. fcntl doesn't error if you give an unusable hint, so
> neither should this. You get sane default behavior.

Well, why does it have to be a hint?

If I have a data placement aware application I really want to know
into how many buckets I can sort and adjust my algorithm for it.
And I'd rather have an error checked interface to pass that down
as far as I can.

Same for my file system use case.  I guess you have a use case where
a hint would be enough, at least with good enough knowledge of the
underlying implementation.  But would there be an actual downside
in not having a hint?  Because historically speaking everything we've
done as a not error checked vaguely defined hint has not been all
the useful, but it in hardware or software interfaces.




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux