On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 04:56:41PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Matthew Wilcox wrote: > >With sysfs making these options tunable at runtime, there's no > >justification for keeping this horrendously complex specification > >string around. > > > >Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >--- > > Documentation/scsi/sym53c8xx_2.txt | 21 +++-------- > > drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym53c8xx.h | 1 - > > drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_glue.c | 66 > > ++-------------------------------- > > 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-) > > ACK presuming you are convinced this will not break anybody in the field Yeah, I am. When Rusty did the conversion of sym53c8xx="..." to individual module params, I didn't hear a single complaint. I feel sure nobody's using these options any more. -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
